FANDOM

Cryptar

aka Cryptar

Admin Discussions Moderator
  • I live in England, UK
  • I am Male
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • On the Basic Cable episode page, you deleted the "Episodes focusing on Scott" category I created because the character didn't have enough episodes to be it's own category. Yet, a bunch of minor characters in the show have their own categroies which only contain very few episodes such as 2 or 3. David has a category and his only has one episode listed. Even characters such as Stuart and Principal Victoria have categories and have no episodes listed at all. I'm am wondering why did you delete the category and revised the page since no other character as of right now is the main focus of the episode. If the category does not come back, I won't mind. I just want to do is know the reasoning behind this.

      Loading editor
    • While I agree that Scott probably needs a category for episodes, I really don't like the idea of putting the categories before the episode airs. At the moment, our categories are a huge mess and we will look into them in the near future. I removed those categories mentioned by you.

        Loading editor
    • SilasGreaves12 wrote: While I agree that Scott probably needs a category for episodes, I really don't like the idea of putting the categories before the episode airs. At the moment, our categories are a huge mess and we will look into them in the near future. I removed those categories mentioned by you.

      Alright. I understand why you removed them. I did not know that I shouldn’t put categories for upcoming episodes. Thank you for replying and I won’t edit upcoming episodes before they air.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Thanks for blocking the vandal sending me death threats. I need you to delete the photos he uploaded. I was undoing his edits so don't worry about rolling back (I'm an admin on three Wiki's and I know how annoying it gets to undo each and every bad edit). 

      Loading editor
  • How can I block users for an infinite amount of time

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • 55d5c3104dab7154578b4569
      Loading editor
  • In The Return of Chef, Kenny definitely says more than 3 words here, but unfortunately, I can't figure out his muffled speach.

    Kyle Something must have happened to Chef while he was gone. Maybe he hit his head or, or got stuck in some quantum time vortex.
    Stan Well look, he spent the last three months with that adventurers' club. Maybe they know what happened to him.
    Kenny (muffled) Yeah! I think...
    Cartman Yeah!
    Kyle  

    All right, come on guys!

    Unowninator (talk) 02:55, September 19, 2018 (UTC)

      Loading editor
    • I'll look into it, I'll see if the DVD has the subs ;)

        Loading editor
    • Interestingly, the DVD subs doesn't even show the "I think" part, though I agree that part is the only one that is clear. I beleive after that, Matt stone was just using gibberish and it was used a a joke.

        Loading editor
    • Oh, really? That's disappointing. When I heard him talking, I interpretted it as "Yeah. I say we go to the Super Adventure Club, and maybe then we'll see what's wrong." But I was only confident in the first half of that.

      Oh well, thanks for checking. Unowninator (talk) 15:20, September 19, 2018 (UTC)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • What am I doing wrong?

      Loading editor
    • This section tels you all you need to know but article comments can only be about how to improve the article.

        Loading editor
    • But you are also not allowed to remove messages from administrators without asking them. Everything was in the template that you needed to know. I will put it back now as it tells us you have already been warned but it does nothing against your conduct other than that.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Cryptar. i wanna say that you've been a nice user to me.

      Loading editor
  • Hey, regarding this edit, __TOC__ will not place the table of contents, it is used to move the table of contents (if the table exists; if the table doesn't exists, then __FORCETOC__ should be used). For example if I want the table of contents to be at the middle of the article, I can type __TOC__ right at the middle of the article. __FORCETOC__ is for placing the table of contents if the article doesn't have at least 4 headings and __TOC__ is for moving it. I hope this will clear the confusions.

      Loading editor
    • Noted. TBH I plan to clean out that section of the sandbox when this is cleared up. Should I insert that right after the last item in the template coding if we're all good?

      I'm not used to template coding as you can tell. Will be late to seeing a reply as I'm going to bed :V

        Loading editor
    • Hmm...Charlie will take a look on the situation this weekend.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hiya, just wanted to ask a tiny little thing. Commonly the term "silenced" has been coined for a surpressed weapon, however the technical term for it is "surpressed" by the Military and by Firearms Specialists. I've seen pages that uses the term "silenced" rather than "surpressed". Which do you think is more appropriate for the matter?

      Loading editor
    • Yea I know what you mean, I would say personally that 'suppressed' is the most correct term as there are few times that a weapon could be considered 'truly silenced' although you could debate by hearing the action it is still not a silent weapon. Anyhow, the incorrect term is the most common in use so is quickly understood to the general audience that reads the wiki. Also, enthusiasts could debate all day how to pronounce 'cupola' [on a tank/armoured vehicle] but it could be seen as something that doesn't matter. Somewhat relevant, even the 'official term' for a small pistol, "derringer", is actually a misspelling of the last name of Henry Deringer. So even though I think it's a good idea my own standing could be defeated by, 'did the person understand what you meant?' and the answer is most people would probably say no.

      But maybe it would be worth starting a discussion post to see what others think. For now I will log the pages with such mentions on my sandbox in that section.

        Loading editor
    • I'm compiling this list for the sandbox now but do let me know if I miss any that you have seen.

        Loading editor
    • Thanks for the response. I'll be on the look out.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey there! Welcome back and great edits you've been making! I've noticed you were a former administrator and I'm curious if you're interested in joining the current team? Feel free to reach out to me if you need anything and it's great to have you back!

      Loading editor
    • Thanks well it's helped that I've started going over the episodes again and listening to commentary ;) Well it's funny I've been thinking this over, the problem is I can't guarantee how long I will be on the wiki for because I sometimes have these spurts of activity that trails off. I wouldn't mind having it attached to my profile again but it would likely make me an "inactive admin". However, there have been one or two instances recently where I could have caught something; like even when I don't edit I essentially 'patrol' the recent activity. Anyway, the summary is I would not say no but I would not be offended if you felt it would be redundant.

        Loading editor
    • I certainly don't want to force you into anything but just know that the invitation is always there! :) Also worth noting the best way to communicate with us aside from the wiki is with our Discord.

        Loading editor
    • Both noted, I haven't been on there yet but I've never been much of a live chat person lol.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.