Butt Out.
I felt like Pip deserved something better than this, he was one of the friendliest and kindest people in South Park, willing to help out the town twice despite their awful treatment of him and despite having practically zero friends in Let’s Go Tower Defense Play! and 201. And yet he gets unceremoniously stomped on by Barbara Streisand.
While I do believe that Pip’s death was for the best, I feel like that this wouldn’t have happened if Matt and Trey just utilized him as more than a punching bag parody of the original Pip (who himself was far meaner and actually became an prick in his original story).
What character is this?
@Saintgliso For a series finale that sounds… just really underwhelming, and kind of generic.
Why would Cartman get a redemption? Didn’t Season 25 and End of Obesity heavily imply that his future homelessness is well deserved? It also just seems, a little uninteresting… because who actually wants Cartman to be redeemed?
Shelley simply isn’t that important of a character to Matt and Trey, especially not during Seasons 16-19, she wouldn’t become more relevant until Season 22. Additionally, unlike other characters like Scott, Clyde, Craig, Tweek, or (originally) Randy, people weren’t clamoring for Shelley nor was she considered well-liked by most of the fanbase.
The adults in South Park seem to be at peak stupidity around 40 years of age, on that note, since Stephen would have been 30 during Leopold’s birth, he might not have been prepared. Additionally that could mean he grew up in 1960s-1970s which could give him a poor idea of a good father.
That’s a shame. What was the idea?
Weren’t you banned for self-promotion?
It would explain some of his immaturity and poor judgement.
As did I.
@Saintgliso I’m a little confused on who you’re referring to.
@DoctorRobloxianABC Why not just Saddam Hussein at that point? Saddam is already portrayed as mostly pure evil in a likable Canadian skin, and it’s not like it would be that hard to justify him commanding or manipulating Scott Tenorman into evil.
Also, there’s the elephant in the room that Satan is dead.
He did have a major impact on two episodes, and he’s used often in the background, so he’s not a complete One-Shot.
@Unbreakableunion This is about season 7, not just any episode that you dislike.
Fair enough, but is there anything you’d particularly like to see he get into?
The first one isn’t a plot hole, the reason why Scott blamed Cartman is because Cartman was the mastermind behind it all. While Denkins did shoot, it was only under Cartman’s influence, additionally, Cartman was the one who fed his parents to him.
The third one is just an error, they just forgot she was dead because she was commonly used a background character.
For the fourth one, Stephen was called Chris as late as Asspen, but it was probably just a Recton.
Linda: Oh, Chris.
The sixth one isn’t even a plot hole, it’s properly explained as early as season 4 that his mother has to give birth to him (it was just particularly long in this case).
I don’t know about the second and fifth ones, but it was likely either an oversight or another Retcon.
David Rodriguez? Why do you want to see him?
This is pretty cool, I like how it ties in with how Rebecca became a whore by the end of her episode trying spread love. I just wish her arms were a little bigger, but it still looks pretty good. :)