Thread:SomeBritishBloke/@comment-27136824-20161028025431/@comment-27086946-20161028103612

If you had read my comment properly, than you would have noticed that I didn't say their relationship was not genuine, I merely said that its authenticy was ambiguous, as it is, meaning that it is unclear whether it is canon or not. The two may be dating, but in theory, that could refer to them as pretending to date to keep the town happy. Also, the Offical Wiki is actually quite inaccurate, and I don't just mean in regards to this: on several articles, it list several characters as being close friends, even if they've never interacted before (e.g. Dogpoo Petuski appears on Stan's page as a "Close Friend".) Additionally, the wiki also contains pure fanon information, like Craig and Red being cousins, so outright saying that Creek is canon despite conflicting evidence in the episode (i.e. Tweek's joy at being able to pull off the " break-up" and only becoming sad after seeing his fellow students and his father depressed,  Craig's "I can't be something just because people want me to be." line, etc) does seem like the sort of thing they'd say.

I would argue that it is relevant, as it relates to Craig and Tweek's relationship as well as the end of the episode. I don't see why it would cause editing disputes asides from you being so hellbent on declaring them canon. I tell you what, I'll offer a compromise: I leave my information there, and you add the sources you've used and the relevant information to go with it. That way, people reading the article can see your sources and can see my statement, and ultimately form their own conclusion. Capiche?