Thread:Scatmanticore/@comment-27086946-20161028134832

Okay, I'm posting it here because for some reason, I can't respond to you on my own page.

Yeah, I checked the revision history and noticed that you made that change. While I still disagree with the idea that it is set-in-stone canon, I won't try to edit the article to add that section again, as it's clear that you and I are too stubborn to compromise fully, and that it will simply lead to an edit war. Let's just agree to disagree, and leave that article as is (unless any further information pertaining to them crops up in future). 